Global Digital Assets Digest - April 2025
29 April 2025

Welcome to this month's Global Digital Assets Digest. In this month's edition, there are various developments in relation to RTGS. Stateside, there's no let-up in activity, with a number of statements from the SEC on the regulatory treatment of digital assets and associated transactions. In Hong Kong, there's guidance on staking, while the Treasury has issued a statement on the proposed approach to reform for the Australian digital asset industry. In the UK, there are few updates in relation to the digital pound.
1. BIS: Project Meridian FX: exploring synchronised settlement in FX
2. ECB: Danish krone now available in all TARGET Services
3. BIS: Final report: Project Promissa: Tokenisation of promissory notes
4. BIS: Speech by Petra Tschudin, Thomas Moser: Fast and available round the clock - what instant payments mean for households, companies and financial institutions
5. ESMA: Speech by Natasha Cazenave, Executive Director: ECON hearing on cryptoassets and financial stability
6. ECB: Speech by Piero Cipollone, Member of the Executive Board: Empowering Europe: boosting strategic autonomy through the digital euro
7. ECB: Speech by Piero Cipollone, Member of the Executive Board of the ECB: Enhancing cross-border payments in Europe and beyond
8. MICA: Delegated Regulations published in the Official Journal
9. FCA: Speech on global responses to digital assets regulation
10. FCA: Statement: Update on PISCES and pre-application support
11. BoE: Digital pound experiment report: Offline payments
12. BoE: Digital Pound: Design note – Intermediary roles and scheme rulebook
13. BoE: Minutes of the CBDC Engagement Forum - November 2024
14. BoE: Response document to discussion paper on access to RTGS accounts for settlement
15. BoE: Speech by Victoria Cleland: Innovating wholesale payments: building a resilient and innovative future
16. NAO: Work in Progress: The Bank of England’s Real-Time Gross Settlement Renewal Programme
17. SFC: Guidance on Virtual Assets Staking
18. HKMA: Circular on Virtual Assets Staking
19. PCPD: Checklist on Guidelines for the Use of Generative AI by Employees
20. HKMA: Research Paper on Distributed Ledger Technology
21. Treasury: Statement on Developing an Innovative Australian Digital Asset Industry
22. Shadow Commonwealth Treasurer: Bill on "Securing Australia as a Financial Centre"
23. SEC: Crypto Taskforce Roundtable – speeches by officials
24. SEC: Statement on offerings and registrations of securities in crypto asset markets
25. House Financial Services Committee: “American Innovation and the Future of Digital Assets: Aligning the U.S. Securities Laws for the Digital Age"
26. DOJ: Memorandum on ending regulation by prosecution
27. House Financial Services Committee: Op-Ed on market structure principles
28. SEC: Statement on stablecoins
29. SEC: Letter from Maxine Waters and Elizabeth Warren on possible conflicts of interest
30. House Financial Services Committee: Letter to federal agencies on recission of Biden administration polices
31. House Financial Services Committee: Digital assets legislation advanced
32. FDIC: Guidance on banks engaging in certain crypto-related activities
33. CFTC Staff Withdraws Advisory on Virtual Currency Derivative Product Listings
34. SEC: Speech by Commissioner Hester M. Peirce before The Digital Chamber's 8th Annual DC Blockchain Summit - Miles To Go
35. SEC Statement on Certain Proof-of-Work Mining Activities
On 24 April 2025, BIS issued a report in relation to Project Meridan FX, an initiative to seeking to address some of the action points laid out in the G20 Roadmap on Cross Border Payments (reducing foreign exchange settlement risk using payment-versus-payment transactions and linking wholesale payment infrastructures of different countries).
Synchronisation involves coordinating the movement of central bank money between accounts in wholesale payment infrastructures, including RTGS systems. Stakeholders consider that synchronisation can expand atomic settlement in central bank money to a wide range of assets and funds. Project Meridan FX builds on Project Meridian, which explored the concept of synchronisation, by looking at synchronisation in a multicurrency FX transaction.
Under the initiative, a synthetic version of the UK RTGS system was connected to three experimental Eurosystem interoperability solutions: DL3S (developed by the Bank of France), TIPS Hash-Link (developed by the Bank of Italy) and the Trigger Solution (developed by the Deutsche Bundesbank). BIS considers that the project demonstrated that FX transactions can be settled across jurisdictions and different types of infrastructures.
The ECB released a statement in respect of Project Meridian.
On 23 April 2025, the ECB confirmed that Danish Krone is available for settlement Eurosystem’s T2 and TARGET Instant Payment Settlement (TIPS) services. The ECB confirms Danmarks Nationalbank as the first non-euro area central bank to participate in all three TARGET Services and that TIPS supports three currencies: the euro, the Swedish krona, and the Danish krone. Danmarks Nationalbank applied to join T2 and TIPS in 2020, with the currency participation agreement signed in 2024.
On 23 April 2025, BIS issued a final report in respect of Project Promissa, an initiative between BIS Innovation Hub, the Swiss National Bank, and the World Bank. The project looked at how the financial commitments of member countries to multilateral development banks could be managed more efficiently via tokenisation. The project developed a proof-of-concept platform for tokenised promissory notes, automating many manual processes.
On 10 April 2025, BIS published a speech delivered by Petra Tschudin, Member of the Governing Board of the Swiss National Bank, and Mr Thomas Moser, Alternate Member of the Governing Board of the Swiss National Bank, at the Money Market Event, Zurich. The speech summarises the latest developments in relation to cashless payments in Switzerland, as well as challenges and opportunities posed by instant payments.
Notable points
On 8 April 2025, ESMA published a speech by Natasha Cazenave, Executive Director at the ECON hearing on cryptoassets and financial stability.
On 8 April 2025, ECB published a speech by Piero Cipollone, Member of the Executive Board, examining the meaning strategic autonomy in day-to-day payments and the benefits of a digital euro.
Key points
On 1 April 2025, the ECB published a speech by Piero Cipollone, Member of the Executive Board.
Key points
On 31 March 2025, a number of delegated regulations supplementing MICA were published in the Official Journal.
On 25 April 2025, the FCA published a speech by Jessica Rusu, Chief Data, Information and Intelligence Officer, on the global responses to digital assets regulation. The speech sets out how the FCA's is supporting growth and innovation through smarter systems and reduced regulatory burdens. The speech refers to the FCA's new five-year strategy and argues that technological changes have led to significant changes in the financial services sector. It refers to various FCA initiatives such as the Regulatory Sandbox, Digital Sandbox and Digital Securities Sandbox.
The speech notes the global nature of the digital assets industry, arguing that the FCA must keep abreast and be involved in efforts being undertaken in other international jurisdictions. Ms Rusu summarises key work the FCA has undertaken to date (including FCA's Crypto Roadmap and the Private Intermittent Securities and Capital Exchange System).
On 10 April 2025, the FCA published a web page in relation to the Private Intermittent Securities and Capital Exchange System (PISCES). PISCES is new type of trading platform enabling intermittent trading of private company shares using market infrastructure. The webpage follows a December 2024 consultation paper (CP24/29) on a regulatory framework (see Ashurst Global Digital Assets Digest January 2025 edition).
The statement sets out the FCA's likely final position and is designed to support firms planning to operate PISCES
Areas covered include:
On 10 April 2025, the BoE published a report looking at whether an offline payment functionality for a digital pound can be implemented. The report defines an "offline payment" as a payment occuring while neither payer nor payee has access to the CBDC network.
The BoE and HMT are currently in the design phase in relation to the UK CDBC, having moved from the research and exploration phase of work. The Technology Working Paper accompanying the consultation paper on digital pound argued that an offline payment functionality could be useful in the event of network disruption or outage of telephony services, as well as promote other objectives.
The report assesses whether offline CBDC payments could achieve: finality and irrevocability; double spend and counterfeit detection; and compliance with fraud and anti-money laundering regulations. It concludes that an offline payment functionality for a digital pound is technically feasible, but that there are challenges (e.g. security, performance, and user experience).
On 10 April 2025, the BoE published a design note on the potential roles and responsibilities of digital pound intermediaries and a preliminary conceptual framework for a digital pound rulebook. Design notes outline emerging thinking of the BoE on specific topics in relation to the design phase of the digital pound. As set out in the initial design note on the digital pound blueprint, work will focus on four pillars: product, vision and strategy; scheme and regulation; technology; and operations.
A scheme rulebook would set out the responsibilities for participants in the digital pound. The design note builds upon earlier work on potential interaction of digital pound intermediaries (PIPs and ESIPs) under a digital pound scheme rulebook and with the digital pound core platform.
On 10 April 2025, the BoE published the minutes of the CBDC Engagement Forum held in November 2024. Areas discussed included the National Payments Vision (see briefing here) and findings and recommendations from the Retailer Needs Working Group on the digital pound. This included: the need for the digital pound to support B2B functionality, so as to tackle current frictions in UK retailer payments; and key challenges impacting digital pound adoption from a merchant-perspective (including security and network connectivity).
The Forum also discussed the importance of monitoring the ECB’s work on B2B payments for the digital euro, as well as the delivery of conditional payments functionality by wallet providers.
On 8 April 2025, the BoE published its response to its February 2024 discussion paper on access to RTGS accounts for settlement (see Ashurst Global Digital Assets Digest February 2024 edition). The response document summarises feedback received by the BoE in relation to the following areas: enhancing the BoE/FCA process for consideration of Non-Bank Payment Service Providers (NBPSPs) seeking access to RTGS; understanding the demand for foreign banks for access to RTGS to support payment system settlement; clarifying requirements for FMI to access RTGS; and reviewing of the CHAPS value threshold. The response also sets out other barriers to accessing RTGS identified by respondents.
In light of feedback, BoE has published:
The BoE also sets out areas of future policy outlook, including: settlement accounts with safeguarding facilities for NBPSPs; support of NBPSP regulatory reform; and further industry engagement on the CHAPS direct participation threshold review.
On 25 March 2025, the BoE published a speech by Victoria Cleland, Executive Director, Payments. The speech discusses expanding access to the RTGS and ISO 20022.
Main points
The NAO published a webpage on progress made in relation to a study on the RTGS. This will look at how well the BoE is carrying out the renewal programme and will assess whether:
No new entries.
On 7 April 2025, the SFC issued a circular providing guidance to licensed virtual asset trading platforms (VATPs) on the offer of staking services. In parallel, the SFC revised its circular on SFC-authorised funds with exposure to virtual assets to facilitate their engagement in staking. (see SFC news, circular on VATPs and circular on SFC-authorised funds).
On 7 April 2025, HKMA issued a circular to set out the standards expected of authorised institutions (AI) related to the provision of staking of virtual assets from custodial services to their customers. AIs should maintain internal controls to protect client's' virtual assets, disclose general information and risks about their staking services, and act with due skill, care and diligence when including a blockchain protocol and seeking third-party service providers (see circular).
On 31 March 2025, the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data (PCPD) published guidelines for the use of generative AI by employees. The guideline provides recommendations to organisations on the scope of permissible use of Gen AI, protection of personal data privacy, lawful and ethical considerations, data securities, and consequences of breach of policies and guidelines. It also provides practical tips on supporting employees in using Gen AI tools. (see media statement and Checklist on Guidelines for the Use of Generative AI by Employees).
On 19 March 2025, the HKMA issued a research paper on DLT in the finance sector. The research paper explores the transformative role of DLT, as well as its benefits, challenges and potential use cases for the financial industry. It also analyses the potential risks associated with the adoption of DLT and offers recommendations on how to mitigate them. (see circular and Distributed Ledger Technology in the Financial Sector: A Study on the Opportunities and Challenges).
On 21 March 2025, the Treasury released a statement with a proposed approach to reform for the Australian digital asset industry.
The Australian Government's proposed approach to Digital Assets
Businesses operating DAPs or issuing tokenised SVFs (such as stablecoins) will have to comply with general obligations such as:
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is currently considering stakeholder feedback on its proposed updates to Information Sheet 225 (INFO 225: Crypto-assets). ASIC will also assist with the transitional arrangements before the legislative reforms take effect.
The statement acknowledges de-banking is a risk to the digital asset industry and intends to implement the recommendations from the Council of Financial Regulators (CFR) paper "Potential Policy Responses to De-Banking in Australia".
The Government also sets out future work streams to be considered such as the Crypto Asset Report Framework, Enhanced Regulatory Sandbox, Central Bank Digital Currencies, Tokenisation and DeFi.
The Government intends to release a draft legislation of the reforms in 2025 for public consultation. See our Ashurst's Financial Services Snapshots for further discussion on this update and its implications.
Shadow Commonwealth Treasurer Angus Taylor announced on 2 April 2025, at the National Press Club, that the Coalition will introduce the "Securing Australia as a Financial Centre" Bill within 100 days following the next Australian federal election, on 2 May 2025. According to Angus Taylor, the Bill is proposed to legislate key financial service reforms ranging from payments system reforms, digital assets regulation and restoring the financial advice profession.
On 11 April 2025, the SEC published remarks by Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw and Commissioner Mark Uyeda delivered at the SEC's April 2025 crypto roundtable “Between a Block and a Hard Place: Tailoring Regulation for Crypto Trading".
Key points from Uyeda
Key points from Crenshaw
The SEC's Crypto Task Force is also holding the following roundtables:" Know Your Custodian: Key Considerations for Crypto Custody" ( 25 April 2025); "Tokenization - Moving Assets On chain: Where TradFi and DeFi Meet" (12 May 2025); and "DeFi and the American Spirit" (6 June 2025).
On 10 April 2025, the SEC's Division of Corporation Finance issued a statement on how the federal securities law apply to certain offerings and registrations of securities in cryptoasset markets. The statement seeks to set out relevant disclosures to aid investors, including disclosures concerning the development timeline of a crypto network /application, its functions and processes, and the rights of holders of the relevant security (e.g. dividends, profit-sharing, or voting rights). The SEC suggests that the statement may be of use to a company: developing a blockchain and issuing debt or equity; registering the offering of an investment contract in connection with an initial coin offering; and issuing a cryptoasset that is a security.
The statement sets out the SEC's observations on disclosures provided in response to existing disclosure requirements. Areas covered include risk factors; description of securities; rights, obligations and preferences; information on management; financial statements; and technical specifications.
On 10 April 2025, the House Financial Services Committee Digital Assets, Financial Technology, and Artificial Intelligence Subcommittee held a hearing entitled “American Innovation and the Future of Digital Assets: Aligning the U.S. Securities Laws for the Digital Age”. The hearing examined the legal uncertainty on the application of securities laws to digital assets. It looked at which digital asset activities implicate U.S. securities law, why current regulations may not apply, and the legislative actions that can be taken to address the challenges.
On 7 April 2025, the Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche of the DOJ issued a memorandum in relation to enforcement policy for cryptoassets. This follows the executive Order on digital assets signed by President Trump in January 2025 (see Ashurst Global Digital Assets Digest February 2025 edition). The memorandum notes that the Order requires the DOJ to prioritise investigations and prosecutions involving conduct causing financial harm to investors; or the use of digital assets to further criminal conduct. Accordingly, prosecutors are not to pursue regulatory violations of registration requirements under various legislation where this would lead to the DOJ deciding whether a digital asset is a security or a commodity; and where there is alternative criminal charge available. The memo also confirms that the DOJ will be disbanding the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team.
In response, the CFTC published a statement from acting chairman, Caroline Pham welcoming the approach and confirming that the CFTC’s enforcement resources would focus on cases involving fraud and manipulation. Pham confirmed that the CFTC would deprioritise actions involving violations of registration requirements under the Commodity Exchange Act, unless there is evidence of wilful violation.
On 4 April 2025, Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, French Hill, and House Committee on Agriculture, Chairman G.T. Thompson, published a CoinDesk Op-Ed on market structure legislation. This sets out core principles to be included in digital asset legislation: promote innovation; provide clarity for the classification of assets; codify a framework for the issuance of new digital assets; establish the regulation of spot market exchanges and intermediaries; establish best practices for the protection of customer assets; and protect innovative decentralised projects and activities and an individual’s right to self-custody their digital assets.
On 4 April 2025, the SEC's Division of Corporation Finance issued a statement in relation to the regulatory treatment of certain stablecoins. These are termed covered stablecoins (i.e. stablecoins designed to maintain a stable value relative to the US dollar, on a one a one-for-one basis, backed by assets held in a reserve considered to be low risk and liquid). The statement assesses whether covered stablecoins are notes or debt instruments under the test set out in Reves V Ernst & Young, as well as whether they amount to "investment contracts" under the test set out in SEC v W.J Howey (Howey Test) and therefore whether associated transactions require registration.
The Division explains that the Reves test involves a holistic assessment of four factors: motivation of seller and buyer; plan of distribution of the instrument; reasonable expectations of the investing public; and risk reducing features. The Division concludes that covered stablecoins are not securities under Reves because: the proceeds are used by sellers to fund a reserve and buyers are not motivated by an expected return on their funds; the manner in which covered stablecoins are distributed does not encourage trading for speculation or investment; a reasonable buyer would likely expect that covered stablecoins are not investments; and the availability of a reserve is a risk-reducing feature.
The Division also concludes that covered stablecoins are not offered or sold as investment contracts for the purpose of the Howey Test, as the purchase of covered stablecoins does not involve "a reasonable expectation of profit derived from the entrepreneurial or managerial efforts of others" (as the instruments are not marketed as investments).
The statement confirms that offer and sale of covered stablecoins in the manner and under circumstances discussed does not amount to offer and sale of securities within the meaning of Section 2(a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
On 2 April 2025, Senator Elizabeth Warren and Representative Maxine Waters sent a letter to the SEC Acting Chair, Mark Uyeda, calling for transparency regarding potential conflicts of interest in relation to certain cryptocurrency entities and their impact on SEC decision making. The letter requests various communications and records from the SEC.
On 1 April 2025, it was announced that Members of the House Committee on Financial Services Subcommittee on Digital Assets, Financial Technology, and Artificial Intelligence had sent letters to the Federal banking agencies and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The letters call for a withdrawal of certain regulatory actions said to restrict financial institutions’ engagement in digital assets. Rules cited in the correspondence include: CFBP Final Rule on Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications; and the Federal Reserve's SR 22-6 (engagement in cryptoasset-related activities by Federal Reserve-supervised banking organisations) and SR 23-8 (supervisory nonobjection process for state member bank engagement in dollar token activities).
In April 2025, the Federal Reserve announced that it had withdrawn both SR 22-6 and SR 23-8.
In April 2025, the House Financial Services Committee voted to advance digital assets legislation. This includes the Stablecoin Transparency and Accountability for a Better Ledger Economy Act (the STABLE Act,), the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act and the Financial Technology Protection Act.
This follows the Senate Banking Committee's recent passage of the GENIUS ACT.
On 28 March 2025, the FDIC issued a Financial Institution Letter (FIL-7-2025) rescinding FIL-16-2022 and confirming that FDIC-supervised institutions may carry out permissible crypto-related activities without receiving prior FDIC approval. The FDIC confirms that it will continue to work with the President’s Working Group on Digital Asset Markets and may issue further guidance on banks’ engagement in particular crypto-related activities.
On 28 March 2025, the CFTC's Division of Market Oversight and Division of Clearing and Risk confirmed that CFTC Staff Advisory No. 18-14, Advisory with Respect to Virtual Currency Derivative Product Listing would be withdrawn. The DMO and DCR determined that the advisory was obsolete in light of developments.
On 26 March 2025, the SEC issued a speech, delivered by Commissioner Hester M. Peirce at Digital Chamber's 8th Annual DC Blockchain Summit, on how US Congress can create an effective regulatory framework for digital assets in light of regulatory overlap and regulatory overload. Peirce suggests that Congress could:
On 20 March 2025, the SEC's Division of Corporation Finance issued a statement on the regulatory treatment of certain proof of work mining activities, namely whether certain activities meet the definition of "investment contract" under the test set out in SEC v. W.J. Howey Co (the “Howey test”).
The statement refers to mining of cryptoassets "intrinsically linked to programmatic functioning of a public, permissionless network, and are used to participate in and/or earned for participating in network's consensus mechanism or otherwise used to maintain and/or earned for maintaining the technological operation and security of such network" (Covered Cryptoassets). The SEC confirms that mining of Covered Cryptoassets on proof of works networks in the manner described in the statement does not involve the offer and sale of securities within the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act 1934. The statement only applies to the following activities:
The statement does not, however, discuss proof-of-stake networks/other consensus mechanisms.
In response, the SEC issued a statement by Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw criticising the approach adopted and cautioning against the statement being viewed as a wholesale exemption for mining activities. It calls for market participants to note the various caveats outlined in the statement.
No new entries.
No new entries.
Editor: Bisola Williams, Expertise Legal Manager
Contributors: Michelle Lee, Trainee; Julian Pipolo, Senior Associate; Angelique Nelis, Associate; Anson Chan, Junior Associate; Meredith Yip, Trainee; Anna He, Associate
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to.
Readers should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.